Among all the famous scenes in this film like room 237, the bathroom, and Jack axing down the door is a really great one thats not so well known. The maze scene. The scene opens with a tracking shot of Wendy and Danny running out to explore the maze. As they run into the maze
it continues tracking to a picture of a maze and the background music becomes more apparent continuing to the next scene.
Where it cuts to Jack inside traipsing around the living room,
walking towards the model of a maze and just as he bends over it it cuts to a really good shot of him leaning over watching the maze, this shot really signifies his domineering, threatening characteristic in the film
It then cuts to a close up of him with his eyes still on the maze.
And then cuts to an ariel shot of the model maze and as it slowly zooms in the audio changes to a mystical, transitioning music representing the transition of reality and deception. You can hear Wendy and Danny talking and laughing and can see them venturing through the maze (model maze)
And then cuts to Wendy and Danny in the real maze.
This is brilliant use of parallel editing, where cross cutting between two scenes shows action in two different location. The audience know that Wendy and Danny went into the maze and when Jack looks into the model maze it give a sense that he is watching over them. Which again conveys the dominance he has over the two of them
Watch the scene here
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
Monday, March 14, 2011
The Social Networking Moral Panic
As with all youth cultures, media pick particular events surrounding them and blow them out of proportion creating mass hysteria and fear, we are now living in what some scholars and journalist refer to as a culture of fear. As discussed in previous posts the term moral panic first came about in the 70’s with Stanley Cohens book ‘Folk devils and moral panics’ where he analyzed the moral panic surrounding the mods and rockers.
In this post i will discuss the moral panic surrounding social network and how the media have instilled fear in the public with regard to the likes of Facebook and Myspace etc. Since the first social network Myspace came about in 2002 the media have been spinning story after story creating fear among the public
You may remember the case in 2009 of Ashleigh Hall in the UK. The 17 year old met up with a man she met on Facebook and was murdered by him. Headlines such as these swarmed the country causing uproar with parents of teenagers using Facebook.
Terms such as Facebook perv, Facebook fiend, Fackbook killer were commonly used.
But awful crimes like this have been happening long before the like of Facebook and Myspace existed. It would be just a easy for a girl to meet a man like this in a pub or club. Although i realise that age is easier to disguise online but i think children just have to be thought and made aware of these dangers.
Talks of banning the sites from teenagers to protect them continue on. But i think that this is the wrong way to deal with the. Teenagers need to be monitored and educated like you would with the same issues ‘offline’ in the real world “dont talk to strangers” etc. Banning it would only drive social networks underground where it will be harder for parents to monitor.
Heres a video of stand up comedian Doug Stanhope on the subject
In this post i will discuss the moral panic surrounding social network and how the media have instilled fear in the public with regard to the likes of Facebook and Myspace etc. Since the first social network Myspace came about in 2002 the media have been spinning story after story creating fear among the public
You may remember the case in 2009 of Ashleigh Hall in the UK. The 17 year old met up with a man she met on Facebook and was murdered by him. Headlines such as these swarmed the country causing uproar with parents of teenagers using Facebook.
Terms such as Facebook perv, Facebook fiend, Fackbook killer were commonly used.
But awful crimes like this have been happening long before the like of Facebook and Myspace existed. It would be just a easy for a girl to meet a man like this in a pub or club. Although i realise that age is easier to disguise online but i think children just have to be thought and made aware of these dangers.
Talks of banning the sites from teenagers to protect them continue on. But i think that this is the wrong way to deal with the. Teenagers need to be monitored and educated like you would with the same issues ‘offline’ in the real world “dont talk to strangers” etc. Banning it would only drive social networks underground where it will be harder for parents to monitor.
Heres a video of stand up comedian Doug Stanhope on the subject
Communities
The term community has come a long way from the notion of it being a group of people who live in a particular area, with a common purpose, share the same norms and values and interact in a social setting creating a ‘sense of community’ within the group. There a so many different definitions one being:
‘a social group of any size whose members reside in a specific locality, share government, and often have a common cultural and historical heritage.’ Dictionary.com
With the Internet a new form of community developed, community can exist among a group of people who reside in different sides of the globe but share a common interest a mutual understanding. With the Internet an online community can exist transcending geographical limitations. An online or a virtual community can be defined as:
‘social aggregations that emerge from the Internet when enough people carry on public discussions long enough and with sufficient human feeling to form webs of personal relationships in cyberspace.’ Howard Rheingold
There is an argument as to whether an online community is can be classed as a real community, if it is of equal quality as an ‘offline’ community. The stigmas attached to it that it is unsociable, isolated and can cause problem with identity development are all prevent in today society. But I think as long as people keep it in moderation and have face to face relationships as well then its just an extension to our social setting.
I believe in recent times people have more sense of belonging to people in their social networks sites than their neighbours.
‘bonds are formed through bonds of transient mutual interest instead of mutual obligation or proximity’ Caroline O’ Sullivan
It is human nature to connect and interact with people and whether its online or offline it enable them to adapt and mould into society.
Heres a nice video about online communities. Great track too!
‘a social group of any size whose members reside in a specific locality, share government, and often have a common cultural and historical heritage.’ Dictionary.com
With the Internet a new form of community developed, community can exist among a group of people who reside in different sides of the globe but share a common interest a mutual understanding. With the Internet an online community can exist transcending geographical limitations. An online or a virtual community can be defined as:
‘social aggregations that emerge from the Internet when enough people carry on public discussions long enough and with sufficient human feeling to form webs of personal relationships in cyberspace.’ Howard Rheingold
There is an argument as to whether an online community is can be classed as a real community, if it is of equal quality as an ‘offline’ community. The stigmas attached to it that it is unsociable, isolated and can cause problem with identity development are all prevent in today society. But I think as long as people keep it in moderation and have face to face relationships as well then its just an extension to our social setting.
I believe in recent times people have more sense of belonging to people in their social networks sites than their neighbours.
‘bonds are formed through bonds of transient mutual interest instead of mutual obligation or proximity’ Caroline O’ Sullivan
It is human nature to connect and interact with people and whether its online or offline it enable them to adapt and mould into society.
Heres a nice video about online communities. Great track too!
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
Catfish Review
In this post I’ll be review the film Catfish. So if you haven’t watched it yet I suggest you stop reading, the less you know about this film the better. Not that I think anyone outside the class is reading this but I suppose you never really know the internet and its invisible audience.
For me this film was completed new, I had never heard people talking about it or seen any trailers or reviews, which was lucky. At first I thought it was a romcom then a horror and toward the end it spiraled into something completely different.
Filmmakers Henry Joost and Ariel Schulman documenting Ariel’s brother Yaniv ‘Nev’. The film begins with a photographer Nev collaborating with an 8 year old girl Abby (a perfect example of online collaborations and its capabilities). She sends him paintings of his photographs and befriends him on Facebook along with her family, mother Angela and half sister Megan (his “Facebook family”) and a few of their friends.
With this a relationship him and Megan begins to blossom, chatting online via text, calling each other and she sends him some of her music, which he then discovers is not actually hers. Subsequently starting an exploration on the extent of her ingenuity.
The three set of on a trip to her house to meet them face-to-face. Arriving they first become aware that Angela looks totally different to her online persona. And spirals on to the truth of her being all the people on Facebook, painting ‘Abby’s’ pictures and pretending to be Megan all along. With this a deeply saddening story of her life unfolds and wipes out any feelings of anger that the viewer holds because of the extent of her deceit.
It is a compassionate story of technology and psychology. How people can use the Internet to portray any personality traits and create a completely different online persona. And how certain human circumstances can change people feelings.
Whether this film is a true story is irrelevant.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)